Optimal orthogonal arrays

One this page we present orthognal arrays that can be used to analyse second-order interactions. We have selected the arrays that have good D-efficiency. A more detailed description of the software and methods used to obtain the results can be found in the paper Two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions. Note that for small D-efficiency values (corresponding to small A-efficiency values and large average VIF values) numerical instabilities may occur.

For more information please contact pieter.eendebak@gmail.com

Software for manipulating the arrays can be found here. If you use these data, please cite the paper Two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions.



Strength 2

Strength 2, 100 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(100; 2; 23) 13 (12) 0.9993 1.0014 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0016
OA(100; 2; 24) 523 (523) 0.9978 1.0044 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0064,0.0016

Strength 2, 104 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(104; 2; 23) 14 (13) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(104; 2; 24) 694 (692) 0.9984 1.0032 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0059

Strength 2, 108 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(108; 2; 23) 14 (13) 0.9994 1.0012 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0014
OA(108; 2; 24) 709 (709) 0.9981 1.0038 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0055,0.0014

Strength 2, 112 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(112; 2; 23) 15 (14) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(112; 2; 24) 919 (917) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 2, 116 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(116; 2; 23) 15 (14) 0.9995 1.0010 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0012
OA(116; 2; 24) 943 (943) 0.9984 1.0033 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0048,0.0012

Strength 2, 12 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 4.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(12; 2; 23) 2 (1) 0.9508 1.1071 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111
OA(12; 2; 24) 1 (1) 0.8141 1.5682 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.4444,0.1111

Strength 2, 120 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(120; 2; 23) 16 (15) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(120; 2; 24) 1198 (1196) 0.9988 1.0024 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0044

Strength 2, 124 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 15.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(124; 2; 23) 16 (15) 0.9996 1.0009 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0010
OA(124; 2; 24) 1234 (1234) 0.9986 1.0029 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0042,0.0010

Strength 2, 128 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 15.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(128; 2; 23) 17 (16) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0039
OA(128; 2; 24) 1543 (1541) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 2, 16 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 5.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(16; 2; 23) 3 (2) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(16; 2; 24) 5 (3) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(16; 2; 25) 11 (3) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000

Strength 2, 20 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 5.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(20; 2; 23) 3 (2) 0.9827 1.0357 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0400
OA(20; 2; 24) 3 (3) 0.9395 1.1461 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1600,0.0400
OA(20; 2; 25) 11 (4) 0.8661 1.3646 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.4000,0.2000,0.0000

Strength 2, 24 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 6.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(24; 2; 23) 4 (3) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(24; 2; 24) 10 (8) 0.9684 1.0682 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111
OA(24; 2; 25) 63 (36) 0.9390 1.1313 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.5556,0.0000
OA(24; 2; 26) 1350 (447) 0.7926 2.0376 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.6667,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 2, 28 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 6.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(28; 2; 23) 4 (3) 0.9912 1.0179 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0204
OA(28; 2; 24) 7 (7) 0.9712 1.0614 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0816,0.0204
OA(28; 2; 25) 127 (105) 0.9409 1.1319 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.2041,0.1020,0.0000
OA(28; 2; 26) 17826 (14221) 0.8855 1.3053 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.4082,0.3061,0.0000,0.7347

Strength 2, 32 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 7.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(32; 2; 23) 5 (4) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(32; 2; 24) 19 (17) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(32; 2; 25) 491 (429) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(32; 2; 26) 266217 (246813) 1.0000 1.0000 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000
OA(32; 2; 27) ~ 1010 (≥ 988) 0.8432 ≤ D ≤ 0.8648 ≤ 1.5135 100 array(s) (binary) -
OA(32; 2; 27) ~ 1010 (≥ 15) 0.8432 ≤ D ≤ 0.8799 ≤ 1.5135 15 array(s) -
OA(32; 2; 27) 530469996 (395932754) 0.8432 1.37159375 - -

Strength 2, 36 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 7.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(36; 2; 23) 5 (4) 0.9947 1.0107 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0123
OA(36; 2; 24) 15 (15) 0.9827 1.0362 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0494,0.0123
OA(36; 2; 25) 1242 (1174) 0.9635 1.0800 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1235,0.0617,0.0000
OA(36; 2; 26) ~ 3 ⋅ 106 (≥ 125990) 0.9374 ≤ 1.1432 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(36; 2; 26) ~ 3 ⋅ 106 (≥ 2777) 0.9374 ≤ 1.1432 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(36; 2; 27) ~ 1010 (≥ 9254) 0.9022 ≤ 1.2414 100 array(s) (binary) -

Strength 2, 40 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 8.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(40; 2; 23) 6 (5) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(40; 2; 24) 32 (30) 0.9889 1.0227 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0400
OA(40; 2; 25) 3919 (3786) 0.9781 1.0446 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.2000,0.0000
OA(40; 2; 26) ~ 107 (≥ 6947816) 0.9657 ≤ 1.0682 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(40; 2; 27) ~ 1012 (≥ 2860032) 0.9245 ≤ D ≤ 0.9414 ≤ 1.1727 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(40; 2; 28) ~ 1016 (≥ 70) 0.8019 ≤ D ≤ 0.9506 ≤ 1.7947 70 array(s) -

Strength 2, 44 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 8.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(44; 2; 23) 6 (5) 0.9964 1.0071 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0083
OA(44; 2; 24) 28 (28) 0.9886 1.0234 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0331,0.0083
OA(44; 2; 25) 10151 (10008) 0.9769 1.0483 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0826,0.0413,0.0000
OA(44; 2; 26) ~ 3 ⋅ 108 (≥ 2046270) 0.9622 ≤ 1.0787 30 array(s) -
OA(44; 2; 27) ~ 1014 (≥ 121293) 0.9449 ≤ D ≤ 0.9531 ≤ 1.1238 100 array(s) (binary) -
OA(44; 2; 28) ~ 1019 (≥ 7618) 0.8524 ≤ D ≤ 0.9567 ≤ 1.4549 100 array(s) (binary) -

Strength 2, 48 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 9.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(48; 2; 23) 7 (6) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(48; 2; 24) 54 (52) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(48; 2; 25) 27878 (27601) 1.0000 1.0000 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111
OA(48; 2; 26) » 109 (≥ 688987) 0.9841 ≤ 1.0341 8 array(s) -
OA(48; 2; 27) » 1014 (≥ 154) 0.9585 ≤ D ≤ 0.9787 ≤ 1.1034 12 array(s) -
OA(48; 2; 28) » 1019 (≥ 1) 0.8202 ≤ D ≤ 0.9832 ≤ 1.7349 1 array(s) -

Strength 2, 52 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 9.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(52; 2; 23) 7 (6) 0.9975 1.0051 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0059
OA(52; 2; 24) 48 (48) 0.9918 1.0167 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0237,0.0059
OA(52; 2; 25) 68555 (68272) 0.9830 1.0354 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0592,0.0296,0.0000
OA(52; 2; 26) » 108 (≥ 235305) 0.9711 ≤ D ≤ 0.9731 ≤ 1.0614 20 array(s) -

Strength 2, 56 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 10.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(56; 2; 23) 8 (7) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(56; 2; 24) 84 (82) 0.9944 1.0114 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0204
OA(56; 2; 25) 168146 (167667) 0.9888 1.0226 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1020,0.0000

Strength 2, 60 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 10.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(60; 2; 23) 8 (7) 0.9981 1.0038 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0044
OA(60; 2; 24) 79 (79) 0.9939 1.0124 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0178,0.0044
OA(60; 2; 25) 385693 (385160) 0.9877 1.0251 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0444,0.0222,0.0000

Strength 2, 64 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 10.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(64; 2; 23) 9 (8) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(64; 2; 24) 128 (126) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 2, 68 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 11.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(68; 2; 23) 9 (8) 0.9985 1.0030 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0035
OA(68; 2; 24) 123 (123) 0.9952 1.0096 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0138,0.0035

Strength 2, 72 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 11.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(72; 2; 23) 10 (9) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(72; 2; 24) 188 (186) 0.9966 1.0068 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0123

Strength 2, 76 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 11.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(76; 2; 23) 10 (9) 0.9988 1.0024 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0028
OA(76; 2; 24) 184 (184) 0.9962 1.0077 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0111,0.0028

Strength 2, 80 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 12.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(80; 2; 23) 11 (10) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(80; 2; 24) 270 (268) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 2, 84 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 12.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(84; 2; 23) 11 (10) 0.9990 1.0019 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0023
OA(84; 2; 24) 268 (268) 0.9969 1.0063 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0091,0.0023

Strength 2, 88 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 12.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(88; 2; 23) 12 (11) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(88; 2; 24) 376 (374) 0.9977 1.0045 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0083

Strength 2, 92 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(92; 2; 23) 12 (11) 0.9992 1.0016 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0019
OA(92; 2; 24) 379 (379) 0.9974 1.0052 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0076,0.0019

Strength 2, 96 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(96; 2; 23) 13 (12) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(96; 2; 24) 517 (515) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000


Strength 3

Strength 3, 104 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(104; 3; 24) 7 (6) 0.9984 1.0032 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0059
OA(104; 3; 25) 49 (49) 0.9944 1.0114 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0296,0.0000

Strength 3, 112 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(112; 3; 24) 8 (7) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(112; 3; 25) 89 (88) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0204

Strength 3, 120 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 14.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(120; 3; 24) 8 (7) 0.9988 1.0024 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0044
OA(120; 3; 25) 82 (82) 0.9958 1.0085 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0222,0.0000

Strength 3, 128 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 15.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(128; 3; 24) 9 (8) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(128; 3; 25) 138 (137) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 3, 16 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 5.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(16; 3; 24) 2 (1) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(16; 3; 25) 2 (1) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000

Strength 3, 24 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 6.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(24; 3; 24) 2 (1) 0.9684 1.0682 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111
OA(24; 3; 25) 1 (1) 0.8681 1.3906 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.5556,0.0000
OA(24; 3; 26) 2 (0) 0.0000 inf all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.6667,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 3, 32 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 7.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(32; 3; 24) 3 (2) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(32; 3; 25) 5 (4) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(32; 3; 26) 10 (5) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000
OA(32; 3; 27) 17 (0) 0.0000 inf all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000,2.0000,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 3, 40 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 8.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(40; 3; 24) 3 (2) 0.9889 1.0227 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0400
OA(40; 3; 25) 3 (3) 0.9595 1.0911 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.2000,0.0000
OA(40; 3; 26) 9 (4) 0.9007 1.2652 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.6000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(40; 3; 27) 25 (1) 0.8030 1.8913 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.4000,0.0000,0.8000,0.0000
OA(40; 3; 28) 105 (0) 0.0000 inf all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,2.8000,2.5600,0.6400,0.0000,0.0400

Strength 3, 48 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 9.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(48; 3; 24) 4 (3) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(48; 3; 25) 10 (9) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111
OA(48; 3; 26) 45 (28) 0.9841 1.0341 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1111,0.4444,0.0000
OA(48; 3; 27) 397 (178) 0.9585 1.1034 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.3333,1.3333,0.0000,0.0000
OA(48; 3; 28) 8383 (43) 0.8365 1.5101 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000,2.6667,0.6667,0.0000,0.0000
OA(48; 3; 29) 166081 (1) 0.6753 5.6543 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,2.4444,5.3333,1.7778,0.0000,0.1111,0.0000

Strength 3, 56 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 10.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(56; 3; 24) 4 (3) 0.9944 1.0114 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0204
OA(56; 3; 25) 7 (7) 0.9801 1.0422 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1020,0.0000
OA(56; 3; 26) 86 (74) 0.9567 1.0960 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.3061,0.0000,0.0000
OA(56; 3; 27) 4049 (3387) 0.9192 1.2012 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.7143,0.0000,0.5714,0.0000
OA(56; 3; 28) 757190 (10491) 0.8642 1.4100 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.4286,0.9796,1.1429,0.0000,0.0204
OA(56; 3; 28) ~ 106 (10491) 0.8642 1.4100 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(56; 3; 29) ~ 108 (28) 0.7610 1.9479 28 array(s) -
OA(56; 3; 210) ~ 1010 (0) 0.0000 inf 0 array(s) -

Strength 3, 64 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 10.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(64; 3; 24) 5 (4) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(64; 3; 25) 19 (18) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(64; 3; 26) 358 (326) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(64; 3; 27) 91789 (88129) 1.0000 1.0000 2000 arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,1.0000
OA(64; 3; 28) ~ 107 (≥ 11335) 1.0000 ≤ 1.0000 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(64; 3; 29) ~ 1011 (≥ 2229) 0.9254 ≤ D ≤ 0.9626 ≤ 1.1872 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(64; 3; 210) ~ 1014 (≥ 33) 0.8247 ≤ D ≤ 0.9692 ≤ 1.5476 52 array(s) -

Strength 3, 72 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 11.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(72; 3; 24) 5 (4) 0.9966 1.0068 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0123
OA(72; 3; 25) 15 (15) 0.9881 1.0246 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0617,0.0000
OA(72; 3; 26) 906 (872) 0.9745 1.0542 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1852,0.0000,0.0000
OA(72; 3; 27) ~ 2 ⋅ 106 (≥ 2137154) 0.9553 ≤ 1.0993 180 array(s) (binary) -
OA(72; 3; 28) ~ 109 (≥ 10609) 0.9283 ≤ D ≤ 0.9439 ≤ 1.1707 200 array(s) (binary) -
OA(72; 3; 29) ~ 1013 (≥ 5) 0.8818 ≤ D ≤ 0.9390 ≤ 1.3474 5 array(s) -
OA(72; 3; 210) ~ 1016 (≥ 0) 0.0000 ≤ D ≤ 0.9369 ≤ inf 0 array(s) -

Strength 3, 80 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 12.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(80; 3; 24) 6 (5) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(80; 3; 25) 33 (32) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0400
OA(80; 3; 26) 3494 (3432) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.2400,0.0400

Strength 3, 88 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 12.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(88; 3; 24) 6 (5) 0.9977 1.0045 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0083
OA(88; 3; 25) 28 (28) 0.9921 1.0161 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0413,0.0000
OA(88; 3; 26) 11041 (10980) 0.9832 1.0351 all arrays (binary) 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.1240,0.0000,0.0000

Strength 3, 96 runs

Maximal number of factors from rank constraints: 13.

Case Isomorphisms (full rank) Best D-efficiency Best average VIF Data Best GWLP
OA(96; 3; 24) 7 (6) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000
OA(96; 3; 25) 56 (55) 1.0000 1.0000 all arrays 1.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000,0.0000