Conference designs C(22, 10)
This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.
Results
| Statistic | Results |
| Number of non-isomorphic designs | 16865 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE | 21/22 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI | 20/21 |
| Minimum B4 | 7.6860 |
| Maximum B4 | 16.1488 |
| Minimum F4 | (0, 0, 6, 96, 108) |
| Maximum F4 | (3, 0, 11, 44, 152) |
Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect
Pareto optimal designs
There are 8 Pareto optimal designs in 8 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, and B4 (any other statistics are ignored).
| Index Pareto file | Index design file | Rank 2FI and QE | Rank 2FI | F4 | B4 | PEC4 | PEC5 | PIC4 | PIC5 | PPC4 | PPC5 | Extensions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 14893 | 21 | 20 | (0, 0, 6, 96, 108) | 9.27 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.530 | 18.137 | 1.823 | 1.328 | No |
| 5 | 14891 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 6, 100, 104) | 9.54 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.527 | 18.065 | 1.820 | 1.297 | No |
| 2 | 5001 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 7, 80, 123) | 8.41 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.568 | 18.212 | 1.820 | 1.293 | No |
| 1 | 2998 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 8, 75, 127) | 8.28 | 1.000 | 0.992 | 18.573 | 18.074 | 1.820 | 1.277 | No |
| 3 | 5085 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 9, 70, 131) | 8.15 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.579 | 18.226 | 1.820 | 1.285 | No |
| 0 | 1101 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 15, 51, 144) | 8.08 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.585 | 18.263 | 1.819 | 1.292 | No |
| 4 | 12857 | 22 | 21 | (0, 0, 25, 20, 165) | 8.02 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.581 | 18.216 | 1.829 | 1.294 | No |
| 7 | 15755 | 21 | 20 | (0, 0, 30, 0, 180) | 7.69 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 18.579 | 18.227 | 1.842 | 1.326 | No |
Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.