Conference designs C(20, 12)
This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.
Results
| Statistic | Results |
| Number of non-isomorphic designs | 1172 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE | 20/20 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI | 19/19 |
| Minimum B4 | 22.6800 |
| Maximum B4 | 24.8400 |
| Minimum F4 | (0, 0, 56, 350, 89) |
| Maximum F4 | (0, 21, 18, 330, 126) |
| Data | all arrays |
Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect
Pareto optimal designs
There are 5 Pareto optimal designs in 5 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, B4, PEC4, PEC5, PIC4, PIC5, PPC4, and PPC5 (any other statistics are ignored).
| Index Pareto file | Index design file | Rank 2FI and QE | Rank 2FI | F4 | B4 | PEC4 | PEC5 | PIC4 | PIC5 | PPC4 | PPC5 | Extensions | Max. columns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1167 | 20 | 19 | (0, 0, 56, 350, 89) | 22.96 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 17.039 | 16.287 | 1.781 | 1.189 | Yes | 20 |
| 4 | 1168 | 20 | 19 | (0, 0, 57, 345, 93) | 22.92 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 17.040 | 16.296 | 1.782 | 1.195 | Yes | 20 |
| 0 | 599 | 20 | 19 | (0, 5, 46, 343, 101) | 22.88 | 0.990 | 0.949 | 16.887 | 15.525 | 1.765 | 1.134 | Yes | 20 |
| 2 | 1133 | 20 | 19 | (0, 6, 42, 345, 102) | 22.68 | 0.988 | 0.939 | 16.859 | 15.375 | 1.762 | 1.118 | Yes | 20 |
| 1 | 985 | 20 | 19 | (0, 6, 43, 343, 103) | 22.76 | 0.988 | 0.939 | 16.858 | 15.375 | 1.762 | 1.121 | Yes | 20 |
Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.