Conference designs C(20, 11)
This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.
Results
| Statistic | Results |
| Number of non-isomorphic designs | 1589 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE | 20/20 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI | 19/19 |
| Minimum B4 | 15.0400 |
| Maximum B4 | 17.2000 |
| Minimum F4 | (0, 0, 36, 234, 60) |
| Maximum F4 | (0, 14, 12, 220, 84) |
| Data | all arrays |
Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect
Pareto optimal designs
There are 4 Pareto optimal designs in 4 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, B4, PEC4, PEC5, PIC4, PIC5, PPC4, and PPC5 (any other statistics are ignored).
| Index Pareto file | Index design file | Rank 2FI and QE | Rank 2FI | F4 | B4 | PEC4 | PEC5 | PIC4 | PIC5 | PPC4 | PPC5 | Extensions | Max. columns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1580 | 20 | 19 | (0, 0, 36, 234, 60) | 15.12 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 17.043 | 16.296 | 1.782 | 1.190 | Yes | 20 |
| 1 | 1579 | 20 | 19 | (0, 0, 37, 232, 61) | 15.20 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 17.041 | 16.295 | 1.782 | 1.192 | Yes | 20 |
| 3 | 1584 | 20 | 19 | (0, 0, 39, 228, 63) | 15.36 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 17.038 | 16.297 | 1.783 | 1.198 | Yes | 20 |
| 0 | 1498 | 20 | 19 | (0, 3, 30, 229, 68) | 15.04 | 0.991 | 0.955 | 16.907 | 15.620 | 1.767 | 1.142 | Yes | 20 |
Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.