Class C(18, 9)

Conference designs C(18, 9)

This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.

Results

Statistic Results
Number of non-isomorphic designs 47
Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE 18/18
Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI 17/17
Minimum B4 6.0000
Maximum B4 7.4815
Minimum F4 (0, 0, 45, 81)
Maximum F4 (4, 3, 25, 94)
Data all arrays

Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect


Pareto optimal designs

There are 10 Pareto optimal designs in 9 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, B4, PEC4, PEC5, PIC4, PIC5, PPC4, and PPC5 (any other statistics are ignored).

All Pareto optimal designs.

Index Pareto file Index design file Rank 2FI and QE Rank 2FI F4 B4 PEC4 PEC5 PIC4 PIC5 PPC4 PPC5 Extensions Max. columns
7 44 18 17 (0, 0, 45, 81) 6.00 1.000 1.000 15.561 14.571 1.715 1.084 Yes 18
9 46 18 17 (0, 0, 45, 81) 6.00 1.000 1.000 15.558 14.567 1.719 1.090 Yes 18
0 23 18 17 (0, 0, 46, 80) 6.10 1.000 0.810 15.546 11.823 1.729 0.908 Yes 10
1 25 18 17 (0, 0, 50, 76) 6.49 1.000 0.905 15.532 13.134 1.725 1.003 Yes 10
3 38 18 17 (0, 0, 51, 75) 6.59 1.000 1.000 15.532 14.486 1.720 1.094 Yes 18
4 43 18 17 (0, 0, 51, 75) 6.59 1.000 1.000 15.532 14.486 1.720 1.094 Yes 18
5 41 18 17 (0, 0, 51, 75) 6.59 1.000 1.000 15.533 14.487 1.718 1.092 Yes 18
2 30 18 17 (0, 0, 52, 74) 6.69 1.000 1.000 15.531 14.512 1.716 1.101 Yes 18
6 42 18 17 (0, 0, 54, 72) 6.89 1.000 1.000 15.518 14.445 1.721 1.097 Yes 18
8 45 18 17 (0, 0, 56, 70) 7.09 1.000 1.000 15.510 14.418 1.720 1.098 Yes 18


Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.