Conference designs C(18, 11)
This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.
Results
| Statistic | Results |
| Number of non-isomorphic designs | 10 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE | 18/18 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI | 17/17 |
| Minimum B4 | 16.7160 |
| Maximum B4 | 17.4074 |
| Minimum F4 | (0, 0, 128, 202) |
| Maximum F4 | (0, 0, 135, 195) |
| Data | all arrays |
Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect
Pareto optimal designs
There are 5 Pareto optimal designs in 4 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, B4, PEC4, PEC5, PIC4, PIC5, PPC4, and PPC5 (any other statistics are ignored).
| Index Pareto file | Index design file | Rank 2FI and QE | Rank 2FI | F4 | B4 | PEC4 | PEC5 | PIC4 | PIC5 | PPC4 | PPC5 | Extensions | Max. columns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 9 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 128, 202) | 16.72 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.543 | 14.515 | 1.717 | 1.089 | Yes | 18 |
| 1 | 3 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 131, 199) | 17.01 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.538 | 14.504 | 1.717 | 1.090 | Yes | 18 |
| 2 | 8 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 131, 199) | 17.01 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.538 | 14.504 | 1.717 | 1.090 | Yes | 18 |
| 3 | 4 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 133, 197) | 17.21 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.534 | 14.490 | 1.718 | 1.091 | Yes | 18 |
| 0 | 0 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 134, 196) | 17.31 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.533 | 14.492 | 1.717 | 1.092 | Yes | 18 |
Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.